In the case of the airfoil suddenly changing circulation, shown below the steady-flow figure, the wake indeed has a net vorticity, which makes it roll up into "starting vortex". In this case, we can imagine that the bottom part of the wake has a higher velocity than the top, so that it curls around.
What happens when there is a sudden change in the angle of attack of the airfoil?
The downstream stagnation point stays at the trailing edge
(see Note 1 below). Thus, the bound circulation
changes from
to
. Net
vorticity is now seen across the wake (see Note 2 below). The wake rolls
up into a "starting vortex" of strength
, which convects at
.
From dissipation of flow kinetic energy in the boundary
layer, due to viscous effects, and the resulting loss in momentum. It is
associated with a drop in stagnation pressure in the boundary layer, and
an increase in entropy.
. Note that from now on, when we speak of "lift", we mean "change in lift
due to change in..". There is always a steady-state lift term to be remembered
when the final answer is calculated.
The aspect of interest here is the time-variation of the lift-change term.
As seen from Kelvin's theorem, when the bound vorticity
changes, and equal and opposite amount of vorticitymust be shed into the
wake. The shed vorticity in the wake induces velocity at the airfoil (as
can be calculated using the Biot-Savart Law), opposing the effect of the
quasi-steady lift change. This "lift deficiency" effect decays as the shed
vortex moves downstream. This is seen in the figure below.
is the acceleration. This is 90 degrees out of phase with velocity, and
180 degrees out of phase with displacement. Thus the non-circulatory lift
is 180 degrees out of phase with the displacement. These can be expressed
also as follows:
; where
for simple harmonic motion.
or,
. The quantity within parentheses is called the "circulatory lift" term
(note that the steady-state lift is also circulatory, but here the discussion
is about the components of the time-varying lift.
For small k, an approximation of the tabulated function
is:
where
. This is "Euler's constant". See the linked graph for a comparison
of the approximate expression with the tabulaed function.
(b) the response to an impulsive airfoil motion in steady flow can be calculated using the Wagner function, whose calculation includes the Theodorsen function.
(c) the Kussner function is used to calculate airfoil response in an unsteady freestream (note: this is not the same as unsteady airfoil motion in steady flow).
In the following, we include a perspective on the derivation
of the time-varying lift, using the Theodorsen function and the apparent
mass. This touches upon some of the essential features of airfoil aerodynamics,
but does not go into the detailed, explicit derivation of the Theodorsen
function
. Obviously,
. Using the transformation
from thin airfoil theory,
From thin airfoil theory, we can substitute for
and get coefficients An: (see Note A2)
where
for n=0, and
for n=1,2,3......
Here,
;
; and
for n> 2
Circulation due to downwash w* is (from thin airfoil theory, see Note A3)
so that
.
Lift per unit span
where
is the steady part.
The airfoil surface boundary condition is
where B(x,y,z,t)=0 describes the surface. If B(x,y,z,t) is expressed as
, we get
;
;
, etc.
From the definition
we get
Now, for pitch-plunge motion,
;
. Thus,
wb, the induced velocity of the bound vortex sheet distribution,
wa, the surface motion, and
l, the wake-induced velocity.
Thus,
. Using the Biot-Savart Law,
. The integral equation to be solved is thus:
. This can be inverted using the Carleman-Schwarz inversion:
. This satisfies the conditions of
at x =b, and is singular at the leading edge, as required by the inversion
formula.
Substitute
. Assume that the wake-induced velocity and the body surface motion can
be represented by series:
and
. Substituting,
.
. Using these,
for n other than zero, and
for all n.
.
Substituting, we get
Note:
, so that:
where
for n=0, and
for
From the above, note that:

. The third term is zero, leaving